Artist Clothing 2
777foreverandever (22 points) | Tue, 2009-04-14 22:16I listened to what everyone said and thought about it...
And i came up with another idea...
With this one I was going for a cleaner look but not too clean
Let me know what you guys think
Critiques are greatly appreciated :)
Thank you:)

Commenting on this Image is closed.
Don't be upset by the troll who posted as "Anonymous." Whoever that is must have a mental problem that manifests, in part, as having no identity at all. Very sad.
Mara
Yes, I deleted that comment. It's not the language we appreciate here.
I think it's an improvement over the last logo. Try do a simple 1 color version of the logo as well and see if you like it.
I'm not feeling the tone change in "Artist." It's probably not necessary. I think it will do fine to leave "Artist" as one color, and "Clothing" as that second color.
-Johnny
I don't like the little color change thing you got going on in the middle of the word "Artist". Other than that, it's definitely an improvement. Go down to black and white and see how it looks from there.
:) Thanks Guys
Ha! I didnt even see the "trolls" comment:)
Yeah Ill try going back to black and white thanks guys :)
Mara has great eyes...I missed the troll comment too.
The label idea is cool, but I think you need to deviate from the script you've selected. Maybe try more of a peel-off ragged beer bottle label kinda look...most artists eventually vamoose up that lane anyways....font wise: try urbana; or ....? play...
Begin (stepping in for the MIA Nato) in black and white...makes all more basic and easier to work with (imo).
my mind is on vacation and my mouth is working overtime....
ciao for now...
"Art -- the one achievement of Man which has made the long trip up from all fours seem well advised." - James Thurber
Thanks 3dogmama,
Ill give the other fonts and ideas a try :)
When we point out the gloss look, we're saying it's a problem,not a solution. Please don't go for that look. It won't work in some print media. I realize this is just for fun, but try to imagine you're doing a presentation for a real clothing manufacturer. You'll need to account for all the ways they'll use the design. THis includes hang tags, sewn-in labels, newspaper and magazine advertising (including rag-trade journals that typically have low-quality paper), architectural/industrial signage, trucks, packaging, TV commercials maybe (or just in-house vids), handouts at trade fashion shows, stationery etc. On most of those, the gloss effect on't "read" -- it would only look like a printing mistake. That's my advice, anyway.
Mara
The gray is kind of depressing, I agree the gloss effect will not work the way you intended.
I think some hot colors would do this a lot of good, more fun, more invoking of art.
'I am a patient boy, I wait, I wait, I wait, I wait'
I like this logo but agree with everyone about the gloss effect and imagining how it will be used. I usually start out with a very simple line art logo and then start developing it. That way it will hold up no matter what it is going to be printed on.
Jessica Mahoney
www.holdtheonionplease.blogspot.com