identity piece #2
g23williams (18 pencils) | Tue, 2009-11-03 17:41
This is a revised copy. I know it's plain, but that's what I'm going for.
Commenting on this Image is closed.
Top 10 posts
- Creative business cards Part 1, Part 2, part 3 and part 4
- Snow Leopard desktop pictures
- Change background color in Photoshop and Indesign
- Windows 7 wallpapers
- Keyboard shortcuts in OSX
- Interview with Rob Janoff the designer of the Apple logo
- Does sex in advertising sells?
- 66 truly great minimalist ads
- Arabic calligraphy
- Transparent gradient in Illustrator
Categories
- Acrobat (12)
- Branding (25)
- Competition (6)
- Drupal (3)
- Ego (31)
- Firefox (18)
- Freehand (8)
- GMail (31)
- iLife (2)
- Illustrator (52)
- InDesign (54)
- Inspiration (223)
- Interview (8)
- iOS (20)
- iPhone (30)
- iWork (1)
- Mac OS X (251)
- Off topic (56)
- Operation (76)
- Opinion (141)
- Photography (18)
- Photoshop (220)
- Print (11)
- Project (16)
- Quark XPress (4)
- Review (102)
- Toolbox (176)
- Twitter (6)
- Webdev (137)
Creativebits is a blog about creativity, design and Macs. We also have a critique section where you can post your work to get opinions and a forum to discuss any design related topics.
Recommend us on Google
Latest critique
Do you need a great new logo?
If you need a logo for your company or product you can get it done with us.
In our logo store you can pick from over 28,000 pre-made logos that will be customized to your name for free or you can post a contest for us for just $250 and our designers from all over the world will submit dozens of logo design suggestions to your specific needs.
Marketplace
Mediabistro | SemanticWeb | Inside Network
Jobs | Education | Research | Events | News
Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright 2012 WebMediaBrands Inc. All rights reserved.
i liek them both equally, honestly.
i like that this one has no vertical text and much more legible.
i wonder if that leaky penny has any negatives to say about this.
"i wonder if that leaky penny has any negatives to say about this."
If you wish to cut it in the design world, then you will need to acclimatize yourself to criticism. How 'bout focusing on honing your skills rather than your claws?
3dog
"Art -- the one achievement of Man which has made the long trip up from all fours seem well advised." - James Thurber
The name and the word 'designs' don't fit in with the initial mark. Why did you choose these fonts? They are disconnected from each other. Keep Grant Williams and Designs (and for pete's sake take off the 's') together, not separate. The viewer shouldn't have to put together a phrase that is meant to be singular.
Basics here: Shrink the logo down and see if you can still read your text, The GW are too big compared to the rest of the logo,
Spend some time and find a font that compliments your Initials, then play around with positioning and see what you come up with.
16 billion colours and you choose the one i cant create !??!
The Grim Adventures of Billy&Mandy
or
maybe good for Tim Burton's movies
yes I'm brazilian xD
You need to work on smoothing the connection between the G and the W, as well as the strokes on the bottom portions of the G and W. It looks awkward and poorly drawn.
your vectors need to be cleaned up alot. The G and W have a Tim Burton feel like qwertyale said, I don't know if you were going for that or not. Again, like others have said- there is a total disconnect with your name and 'designs'.
im pretty sure these were not drawn.
everyone ht inks he drew his initials,
but its a font. he did not draw anything.
Thank you, Captain Obvious. When I said "poorly drawn" I meant it is a poorly drawn font.
That said, there is nothing wrong with using a font. But, when it is blown up to that size, all of the little flaws become amplified. It either needs to be well-constructed letterforms, or modified to become well-constructed.