identity piece #2
g23williams (18 points) | Tue, 2009-11-03 17:41
This is a revised copy. I know it's plain, but that's what I'm going for.
Latest critique
Active forum topics
On Demand Videos
On Demand Videos: Video tutorials for graphic designers providing tools and information you can trust — and use — on your very next project. Subscribe today!
i liek them both equally, honestly.
i like that this one has no vertical text and much more legible.
i wonder if that leaky penny has any negatives to say about this.
"i wonder if that leaky penny has any negatives to say about this."
If you wish to cut it in the design world, then you will need to acclimatize yourself to criticism. How 'bout focusing on honing your skills rather than your claws?
3dog
Paddle faster, I hear banjos.
The name and the word 'designs' don't fit in with the initial mark. Why did you choose these fonts? They are disconnected from each other. Keep Grant Williams and Designs (and for pete's sake take off the 's') together, not separate. The viewer shouldn't have to put together a phrase that is meant to be singular.
Basics here: Shrink the logo down and see if you can still read your text, The GW are too big compared to the rest of the logo,
Spend some time and find a font that compliments your Initials, then play around with positioning and see what you come up with.
16 billion colours and you choose the one i cant create !??!
The Grim Adventures of Billy&Mandy
or
maybe good for Tim Burton's movies
You need to work on smoothing the connection between the G and the W, as well as the strokes on the bottom portions of the G and W. It looks awkward and poorly drawn.
your vectors need to be cleaned up alot. The G and W have a Tim Burton feel like qwertyale said, I don't know if you were going for that or not. Again, like others have said- there is a total disconnect with your name and 'designs'.
im pretty sure these were not drawn.
everyone ht inks he drew his initials,
but its a font. he did not draw anything.
Thank you, Captain Obvious. When I said "poorly drawn" I meant it is a poorly drawn font.
That said, there is nothing wrong with using a font. But, when it is blown up to that size, all of the little flaws become amplified. It either needs to be well-constructed letterforms, or modified to become well-constructed.