I'm torn between logos 2 and 6.

With logo 6, you could try replacing the "o" in agrosense with the "sun" ball and angling the leaves slightly beneath the words so that the "o" still hits in the same spot with the leaves; it might also imply that agrosense is fresh and growing as it's part of the vegetative graphic.

I'd lose the birds on logos 7 through 9. In a reduced version they look like a mistake.

ttfn!
3dogmama

yeah, i too agree, 2 and 6 do look best
in color, size of logo, and the position of the logo

I definitely like 6 best. Not sure if there's much to critique about it!

are those two different PMS greens or two tints of one? make sure it's two tints of one. and make sure your client is OK with a 3 color logo. it will be more expensive to print any of their identity materials.

i still prefer the one from the top row visually (even if someone did point out the similarity with adidas on your last post). it's simpler, the logomark will be easier to identify at a glance, the image and text seem better integrated, and it's only two colors. it will also scale better.

It has a nice balance to it, and the composition seems to be more intuitive than the others.

suzanne maestri-walters :: graphic designer :: www.onegirlcreative.com

I like the exploration of variations you've done. At a quick first glance, they all looked nice, and that's a good sign.
I think #2 is the strongest whole statement by itself. However, choosing #6 would allow you to describe use-cases for the mark without the typography. I don't see how #2 gives you that flexibility.

~You need Degas in order to make de VanGogh

I really glad to see your comments about these logos. I personally like logo #6, but my client stresses on #5 for approval. And now the final logo is #5. Thanks again.