Quantcast

Upgrades on creativebits

Ivan's picture

If you're seeing this post you're seeing the site on the new server, an Intel Xeon E5335 2GHz 4-core CPU running on 64bit Linux with 4GB RAM and RAID disks. It's supposed to be really fast. The front page loads in an average of 212ms instead of 1700+ms on the old one running on Dreamhost.

We also upgraded the engine to Drupal 5.7, which forced us to completely rewrite the theme from xtemplate to phptemplate. That's why you were seeing some bugs in the last week. I apologize.

All these changes were possible thanks to JM and Khalid. These infrastructural improvements are paving the way to a new creativebits. If you have a suggestion or comment on what would you like to be changed or improved please chime in.

Aaron B's picture

Congrats!

I'm sure switching can be a pain, but sounds like it was worthwhile. Thanks for giving us speedier viewing!

natobasso's picture

What happened to subscribing

What happened to subscribing to posts? And what is the pink message on the top of every page? "No image toolkit is currently enabled. Without one the image module will not be able to resize your images. You can select one from the image toolkit settings page."

Where's the Tarmac theme? :)

----
Powerpoint is not a design application

Ivan's picture

fixing it...

Sorry, it seems imagemagick is misbehaving. It was working alright earlier. Sorry again!

A white theme is coming! :)

kbahey's picture

Image toolkit is fixed

Image toolkit has been fixed.

--
Drupal development and customization: 2bits.com
Personal: Baheyeldin.com

Ivan's picture

Subscribe button is there in

Subscribe button is there in a different form just below the posts.

roquette's picture

Rating

Hello!

First, thanks for this amazing and simple site. :)

Would be very cool to rate the critique posts. Something easy, like click and rate with 5 stars...

That way lot of people who don't like to write can demonstrate their opinion and would be easy to see the public opinion without reading all posts.

Just an idea.

Regards!

gwells's picture

"critiquing" is not the same

"critiquing" is not the same as "rating." i don't think it helps the person posting for a critique for someone to rate on a numerical scale. a critique is telling them what you think is good, what you think is bad, and possibly giving suggestions for improvement. i actually think a ranking system would be counterproductive.

Ivan's picture

I considered it, but I'm not

I considered it, but I'm not very sure. We are not here to win, but to learn if you know what I mean. I would be interested to know what others think. Shall we do a poll on this issue?

Kilik's picture

How about

a new site design! :) I like Creative Bits but I've always wanted to see a different design for the site. I think a dark background with light type is hard to read.

Ivan's picture

Yes, this is a matter of

Yes, this is a matter of preference, but many people would like to have a light theme, so we are working on it. Until then, press Ctrl-Alt-Shift-8 and see what will happen. ;)

Kilik's picture

The only thing that happened

is my cursor disappeared. Is the color supposed to change or something?

KellyR's picture

Thanks for the upgrades!

Thanks for the upgrades! It's much faster now. I really appreciate it. :)

soyrex's picture

page width and font size

I'd like to see the site use up more of my browser window... the current theme is way to narrow and fixed width. My macbook makes the site seem small.. i hate to think what it would look like on a 30inch cinema display ;)

other than that. the site content is great.. i agree about the dark background and readability.. but i also wish the layout was elastic (set with ems) so i could just zoom the font size and read easy...

rex // http://soyrex.com/ web + graphic designer

Ivan's picture

Yes, I agree. I'm planning

Yes, I agree. I'm planning to make the theme flex.

Kilik's picture

I agree

take up more of the browser window. It's very narrow. And I'm sure most people have larger monitors who visit this site.

plugz's picture

I agree about the width...

At least 1024 please.

Personally the white text/dark background doesn't bother me.

I hope if you're planning a re-design it gets posted in the critique section first, Ivan... ;o)

Ivan's picture

Noted!

Noted!

natobasso's picture

You wouldn't want to read a

You wouldn't want to read a site that wide would you? :) I think 1000px is probably max for readable text. Maybe a flexible layout is best for all medium from cell phone/pda up to cinema screens?

----
Powerpoint is not a design application

onegirlcreative's picture

I have a 24" display

and it is VERY narrow. Just an FYI. :)

suzanne maestri-walters :: graphic designer :: www.onegirlcreative.com

--------
"The name's Bond, James Bond."

www.onegirlcreative.com

Tice's picture

Works like a charm!

Gratulations to the new home.

jockejocke's picture

great

I always hated moving sites to a new server. But you seem to have handled it perfect. Great job.

I have a suggestion regarding the critique section and blog posts etc. How do you feel about having some kind of grading system for all users. Like you get points for writing a comment, a forum post etc. And when you've written a critique, others may grade your critique. So that when ppl the get critisized they can see if its a "heavy" (experienced) user who wrote it. It could also be a way to motivate users to write more (and better), and make this page more alive.

just a thought;)

thanks for a great site

Ivan's picture

Kind of karma? Sounds

Kind of karma? Sounds interesting.

jockejocke's picture

hmm

yea.. what i was talking about is quite similar to a karma system...but its not really meant as a competition in writing. more lika a grading system for the critique posts, to show the person recieving the critique whether other users think that the critique-post (in itself) is spot on or if he/she is better off taking it with a pinch of salt. in short - not grading the user but the post.

if that system is to be extended, it COULD turn to some kind of overall-karma-system. but thats a different question. I personally dont believe that it would really do anything good - we in this forum are already used to competing with our creative ideas, and this site should (in my eyes) be a free zone for us all where we share our ideas and thoughts instead of having a competition on who is the most active user etc.

gwells's picture

it's really the same thing,

it's really the same thing, only difference being what you call it: karma or critique rating. semantics.

jockejocke's picture

really?

karma is tied to a person/user, right?
a critique post though, with three thumbs-up-votes and one thumbs-down-vote is not..
i meant for the grading not to be used as a user karma competition.

if you want to give each specific post its own karma, so sure..then you've found a semantic problem. but discussing what word to call it, is to me far less relevant than discussing the the actual concept.

gwells's picture

fair enough, there is a

fair enough, there is a difference, i wasn't thinking it all the way through.

as i said, i don't object to a system like that, i only doubt how effective it will be.

gwells's picture

there are pluses and minuses

there are pluses and minuses to what ivan termed the "karma" system.

a "heavy" user doesn't necessarily equate to experienced (and there are so many definitions of experienced), just one willing to share their opinions. sometimes they correspond, sometimes they don't (i'm both old *and* won't shut up). it does give some weight to someone who people on the site tend to like and generally to those who share their opinions a lot. but it also lends itself to being a personality contest vs any true measure of experience or quality of their posts.

having used the karma tag on message boards in the past, i find them fun when not taken too seriously, but not necessarily all that effective when trying to use them for a serious purpose.

that said, i wouldn't object to the system being used here, but i wouldn't have high expectations on it proving truly effective in accomplishing the first goal (grading post quality). but it could help with increasing critique counts, i suppose.

3dogmama's picture

So in essence you would be

So in essence you would be critiquing a critique? That's kind of a two-fold isn't it?

However, I get what you're saying. It would be nice to generate more life and comments into the blog and critique sections, but I'm not sure if your proposal is the right one. Hmmm....wondering if we should write a forum on that to find a solution(s)? If so, 10 points for me! :)

"Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible."
— Frank Zappa

"I accept chaos, I'm not sure whether it accepts me."
Bob Dylan

plugz's picture

Not convinced on that.

Any idiot can knock up a big post count and spout off opinions, it doesn't make their input that valuable...

Ivan's picture

That's true

That's true

onegirlcreative's picture

Good idea...

A lot of blogs that I frequent have that same exact system. You're right, it shows the viewer/poster that the person responding is pretty knowledgeable (typically) with their posts, etc.

Or they just don't have a life!!! =P

suzanne maestri-walters :: graphic designer :: www.onegirlcreative.com

--------
"The name's Bond, James Bond."

www.onegirlcreative.com

Kilik's picture

One more thing...

How about the layout being left-aligned? Am I being too picky? :)

plugz's picture

While I'm at it...

That ad bar at the top of the screen is incredibly offensive to the eyes.
Does it really need to be orange?

Ivan's picture

Noted

I will make it less bright I suppose! Thanks

onegirlcreative's picture

Can of worms...

Ivan,

Do you feel like you've opened up a can of worms now??? LOL

suzanne maestri-walters :: graphic designer :: www.onegirlcreative.com

--------
"The name's Bond, James Bond."

www.onegirlcreative.com

Ivan's picture

No

I'm truly grateful for all the feedback. It's very generous of you! :)

Mintsauce's picture

Opinion Rating

Some form of user rating that determines whether someone's critique should be used or accepted with a pinch of salt. Some users are experienced in their fields and deliver good critique like Mara or Nato for instance while others might not be able to deliver critique based on experience and/or talent.

I'm not sure exactly how that would be done yet, but I do think some form of rating + membership time would be a nice indicator.

Just a thought.

Having to say you're thinking out of the box proves you're not.

Mintsauce's picture

Haha

I guess that's been said.

Having to say you're thinking out of the box proves you're not.

archmedia's picture

suggestions

hey ivan, glad to see the sites being updated and re-thought out..
i know i've said my suggestions in the past, but here's a review on them

1) avoid a rating system, the last thing we need is a pissing contest between members
2) a critique section with categories, sometimes i'm just not in the mood to look at posters and just wanna see logo's. would love to be able to click and see just the logo's (that's just an example)
3) a slightly wider site (as previously mentioned by others)
4) require a minimum of 20-25 words in the description of a critique posting. if i'm going to spend my time giving my opinion, i'd like to have an idea of what the brief for the design was.
5) a way to send messages to other members without it being visible to everyone.
ps. i'm curious, whatever became of this...
http://creativebits.org/files/cbv3-loginarea.jpg

____________________________________________
Architectural Technician - Multimedia Designer
www.ArchMedia.us

gwells's picture

i really like #4 there. and

i really like #4 there. and maybe with some default instructions that give the OP some broad guidelines about what should be in the description. some of the people posting here haven't ever heard of a creative brief.

and yes, PMs (private messages) would be greatly appreciated.

Ivan's picture

Noted

We will do these things!

JimD's picture

Oh God please, NO karma/grading/ranking systems, PLEASE!

This isn't meant to be directed at anyone, just my opinion:

These voting/grading/karma or whatever you want to call it systems are an insult to everyone. Who are you (or me) to decide what is good or bad on a post? Just because you (or I) find a post boring, ill-advised, amateur or whatever, doesn't mean that someone else doesn't find incredible value in it. What you find incredibly mundane or bad advice, or whatever - other's may not. By giving negative feedback/karma points or whatever to the post (which is the same as giving it to the person who wrote it), you're insulting the person who spent time writing it, and to the people who did enjoy it or find value in it.

Furthermore, it just invites a whole lot of worthless nonsense into the "community" that isn't necessary and isn't isn't good for the community health. You turn it into a "I have a higher rating than you" type of place. People end up being slighted, hurt feelings, etc... Then they leave. This isn't what CreativeBits was founded upon.

If you don't think it'll happen, visit Digg.com and see what happened there. Basically if certain people high-up on the Digg rating chart don't like your article submission, they bury it and it never makes the home page. The whole site has turned into a nasty stone-throwing playground.

Everyone here is perfectly capable of judging whether or not a post is valid, valuable, enjoyable, or not worth reading at all. The important thing is to let everyone form their own opinion.

-----------
Visit The Graphic Mac for graphics and Mac OS tips, reviews, tutorials and discussion.

gwells's picture

far more eloquent than my

far more eloquent than my comments, but i'm right with you.

jockejocke's picture

Point taken

I see what you mean. And after reading your comparison with digg.com I believe it's even plausible that the negative effects of such a system outweighs the positive ones. But even so, just the discussion about it generated a lot of thoughts on the subject. Interesting.

/J

kbahey's picture

Digg is flawed

I agree with you that Digg has serious flaws. Digg personifies what goes wrong when the entire site is built on nothing but total computer automation of how an article goes to the front page.

Sort of like totally computerized stock trading systems that would do stupid things outside normal conditions.

However, coupled with a bit of human control, things can be better. A select few editors checking the "wisdom of the crowds" would balance things based on blind popularity.

If a karma system is implemented here, it would be no more than a visual indicator of activity/popularity. It would not decide on which articles would bubble up, nor which are buried. It would be just one data point among many, not the be all/end all thingie.

So, there is some value in karma systems, but as everything else, it should not be the sole means of judging something, be it a person or a picture. As usual, nothing beats your own judgment.

--
Drupal development and customization: 2bits.com
Personal: Baheyeldin.com

archmedia's picture

what's the status??

i'll be honest, i haven't been checking on the site for a few reasons, and i can't help but wonder "what the hell happened"

1) not being able to be automatically signed up to a post, let alone signing up at all to receive updates about it, drives me nuts! I think 95% of my traffic on here was cause of an email saying someone replied to a thread i was signed up to

2) only one critique at a time now? what happened to previewing 6? why the downgrade?

3) the CSS is STILL not what it used to be. what happened? let me guess, testing the site LIVE was a mistake? lol, i'm sorry, but i still think that was a foolish mistake.

4) a bunch of changes a few weeks ago, and we haven't seen a thing since, let alone at least getting things back to what they were..

as i was saying, i haven't been on the site much, and quite honestly, those are the reasons why. I'm still shocked some of those changes were made. it didn't make things better for the "community" in my opinion. sorry for being blunt, but that's the truth.

____________________________________________
Architectural Technician - Multimedia Designer
www.ArchMedia.us

User login

Latest critique

suicidal monkeyFor

Internet.Commerce

Partner With Us












Sponsors