The only thing i have against the logo, is that it looks a bit how shall I say... i know it's a flame, but reminds me too much of a... maybe it's just me. Forget it.

You don't need to put your location or postal address?

I does look like a... how you say... umm. Good point. Well maybe that well keep people's attention.

I don't need the postal address... the email is enough.

Ivan, you don't have anything to say about the concept?

http://www.davidpcrawford.com - http://www.vomit76.com

I do like it as a markand maybe try some other colors too.

I think the flame shape is to close in size with the word "Creative" and it's fighting each other. I would make any of the 2 , a lot larger or a lot smaller, for emphases.

To me, the size relationship of the top portion of your logo and the bottom, where your info is at is about the same. Again about emphases.

I would play with the size relationship between them. I also think your info is to crammed together. I would give it more space.

When I saw it I had this feeling hm where did I see that flame thing before?
The font used under both under Creative isn't a good choice.. I don't like it that the names and so on are so close to the white as they are white themself..

What does it mean? Is your name alone not strong enough to get the job Done.
Just your initials DPC are more appealing (to me) than the word creative. stop and think how many people might have done just the same as you with the word creative and some sort of flame.. work a little more on it.

It might not be the most original idea, but I was giving up on that just to have a direct and forcefull personal logo.

It means "creative spark."
But I guess there is a way to make that more clear.

thanks

http://www.davidpcrawford.com - http://www.vomit76.com

Why not call the company Creative Spark? I think that sounds pretty good. You could scale down the 'spark' and place it at the end or over top of the wording. Be creative on is positioning.

With regard to colour, as some here don't seem to be a fan of the blue, why not make the type face black and implement the colour into the 'spark'? You could do a subtle orange-red gradient, or if you wish to keep the blue, model it after a hot gas flame - white-blue gradient.

Hope these suggestions help you out. I think Creative Spark is a solid name and will benefit you more so then Creative.

Cheers,

Ron

This is a personal business card. It is not for a company. It is for myself.

http://www.davidpcrawford.com - http://www.vomit76.com

Hi. I love the minimalesque feel, but for real life purposes, seems like you should make more of the space you got. You don't even use half of it. I'd also stick my web URL on there even though you don't have it done yet... because hopefully you will have it done eventually.

I am a more small font rather than caps-lock kind of girl, but that might just be me.

The flame needs more space above it. When you think about fire there is a tendency not to want things right above it- they catch fire. So human tendency wants to see alot of air space above the flame.

To me it is too minimalistic only in a certain way; I have seen minimalistic cards tha have a good deal of negative space that work. I think the problem I have here is that it seems like a style that should be 'busier' but is used with a minimalistic approach. thus there seems to be an imbalance happening. Perhaps it is the difference between having negative airspace around 'creative' and the flame, which is then not followed, reversed in the information at the bottom, which bleed to edge.

By the way... your flame is cold.. that's not a good thing when you think about it. Why not use a warmer color? I actually thought it was a drop of water before someone said fire.