RGB and CMYK
Hi everyone, i've got a question about modes.
When I create artwork for a document, I start in Photoshop. I work in RGB because of the filters and the look I want to get. However, my Indesign document and Illustrator assets are all in CMYK. So, I go back to my Photoshop file and change the image mode to CMYK. Now the problem is, it looks completely different and awful. The blacks are not black and the effects are all muted. I guess this is because the monitor is RGB that is why I see it like that.
My problem or situation now is:
1. When I create my pdf in Indesign for screen viewing, I have to convert my destination to working-RGB profile, right? Otherwise my pdfs look muted. In fact that is what I had to do today to get it look good on screen.
2. If I package or send a print version pdf, what happens to that Photoshop image that looked good in RGB, but now looks crappy in CMYK mode? My printer is far away and I can't really go there for a test print everytime I change something. Does it print like the quality I get when I see the Photoshop file in RGB mode?
Hope I don't sound too confusing, any thoughts? Thanks.
Jacky
Gamut
Ahh, the age old question about color adjusting images in RGB or CMYK for print and when to switch to CMYK. Some will argue to switch immediately to confine colors within the CMYK gamut while others will tell you to color adjust and save images in RGB to keep maximum color, than save a converted copy in CMYK.
Either way you have to eventually convert color to CMYK for press. This can drastically restrict and mute certain colors which fall outside the limitations of CMYK. (blue triangle in diagram)
Ultimately, you want to send CMYK PDFs to the printer and unless you're crazy do you want their RIP to auto convert color from RGB to CMYK.
I could talk for days on this subject. Go do some research to make sure your CMYK color setup in Photoshop matches the profile of the press and stock you'll be using. Talk with your printer on the correct settings before converting from RGB to CMYK.
I highly recommend you find books and articles by Dan Margulis for details techniques for color adjusting.
http://www.ledet.com/margulis/2007HTM/ACT06-RGB_conversions.htm
working in RGB but seeing CMYK in Photoshop
The previous comment was a great explanation of the why, but I have a pretty good solution to the problem. Yes, we all work in RGB because many filters, etc don't work in CMYK mode. But there is a way to see what an image will look like in CMYK while remaining in RGB mode. Under the View menu in Photoshop go under Proof Setup and choose Working CMYK, then go back under the View menu and be sure Proof Colors is checked. This way we get to work in RGB, but we see what our actual colors will be in the CMYK gamut. I hope this helps!
Joel
working in both
that's definately a great suggestion.
another thing I have started doing is using smart objects to convert my documents.
What you can do in CS3 (and to a lesser extent, CS2) is create your document in RGB, set view>Proof colors, convert the whole thing to a smart object, and then change the color space of the resulting document to CMYK. If need be you can then add adjustment layers to recapture the balance you had in RGB, though you should really design for print from the get go and keep your eye on the color %ages.
Anyway, if you double-click on the thumbnail of the smart object, you can then edit 100% in RGB and as soon as you close the object it goes back to the CMYK color space and the adjustment layers re-update.
Tough one...
As Creative_NRG stated, the CMYK color space is much smaller than the RGB color space. Unfortunately, when you're dealing with printing, you must use CMYK to get accurate color results.
The dark/muted/muddy colors you see when you convert a file to CMYK are a result of adding black to the image, as well as the suffering of a reduced color gamut - see the image in the above post.
There's really nothing you can do about this. However, you can "accommodate" for it when you're working on your images.
You don't necessarily have to convert your image to CMYK until the very end, but you can go under Photoshop's View menu and select Proof Setup. In that menu, select either Working CMYK or the CMYK color profile your printer provides you with. Then, again in the View menu, select Proof Colors (Command + Y). This will simulate what your image will look like in CMYK even though the color mode of the file is still RGB (giving you full access to all the filters, etc.)
Hope that helps!
-----------
Visit Creative Guy for graphics and Mac OS tips, tricks, tutorials and commentary
Adobe RGB (1998)
I'm going to assume you haven't set Photoshop to use Adobe RGB (1998). Check 'Edit - Color Settings' and verify you're using Adobe RGB for print work. By default Photoshop uses sRGB which if you mouse over will give you the following description.
sRGB IEC61966-2.1 - Reflects the characterics of the average PC monitor. This standard space is endorsed by many hardware and software manufactures, and is becoming the default color space for many scanners, low-end printers, and software applications. Ideal space for Web work, but not recommended for prepress work (because of its limited color gamut).
Adobe RGB (1998) - Provides a fairly large gamut (range) of RGB colors and is well-suited for documents that will be converted to CMYK. Use this space if you need to do print production work with a broad range of color.
Also verify your CMYK color settings and Color Management policies.
Also don't forget you can do
Also don't forget you can do a Suite-wide color settings change in Adobe Bridge. Make sure all the apps in the suite are closed than go to Bridge > Edit > Suite Color Settings
If you've created custom settings in any one app, you'll have to save that as a profile and then choose it from the list when you go to Bridge.
____________
work with pete!
bah
is it me or is Bridge really slow and buggy?
I hate bridge! :P
"Try not, Do! or do not, there is no try."
-Yoda
Layers
The gamut issue everyone has been mentioning is dead-on. It's something we print designers have been and will be fighting for a long time. Bright blues and bright oranges are particularly notorious for going muddy fter the conversion.
If you're trying to match any PMS colors, be aware that a very large percentage of PMS color cannot be accurately reproduced in CMYK. You're only fighting the laws of physics when you try.
One thing that can really go wonky when you convert from RGB to CMYK is the way layers interact with one another. Say if you have a layer that has a black area that fades out to transparent, and this layer is on top of another layer. It will look fine in RGB, but give a weird halo effect in CMYK. If you convert the black fade layer to a multiply blend mode, you won't see much difference while in RGB, but it will look much better in CMYK. As a general rule, if you want something to darken what's underneath set your layer (or brush) to Multiply. If you want it to lighten, set it to Screen.
Great point
When I convert layered files from RGB to CMYK I first flatten the image and then change color mode. Once complete I save a new CMYK version of the file and keep the RGB file for web and other work.
Remember... once you convert to the CMYK color space you can't get the additional color back by switching to RGB. [It's gone!]
Neon blues, violets, greens and orange are the most highly effected during converion to CMYK. While in RGB mode you can preview in CMYK and highlight 'out of gamut' colors that will be effected by conversion.
The last part of this equation is 'Monitor Calibration' and 'Ambiant Light'. If you haven't calibrated your monitor and controlling the ambiant light near your workspace you can't trust anything you see on screen.
flattening
Creative_NRG, I was just about to edit my post to add the flattening deal, and you beat me to it! This is extremely helpful to do. You'll find my HD littered with nearly identical image files that have some indication of RGB or CMYK in the file names.
I'm glad you brought up the monitor calibration/ambient light issue. IMO the ambient light issue is just as important as the calibration. If you're really serious about color work, you HAVE to control the lighting around your workspace. It HAS to stay consistent... so having a window in the room doesn't help. (I have a window, but I keep the blinds closed when I'm working.) You should also position your display so there's no reflections from the room's lighting or any other light sources (like windows).
I also make heavy use of the info palette in Ps to keep an eye on the actual color values in an image. After some experience, you get a better feel for what you see on screen, and what's going to fall out of gamut when you go to CMYK and/or paper.
Thanks everyone, It's good
Thanks everyone,
It's good to have professionals giving me advice, gives me confidence to do my work.
Do your RGB effects in a
Do your RGB effects in a separate file and then copy those layers over to your CMYK psd file once they are complete. Then you won't jeopardize the color of the entire file.
Place a flattened tif in your ID layout and export pdf/x-1a for best print results.
----
Powerpoint is not a design application
Boot in Single User Mode
Repair Permissions
Should I also use C=100
Should I also use C=100 M=100 Y=100 K=100 to make sure that my blacks don't get muted, for print? Seems it gets muted on screen when I only use K=100.
Only for large areas of
Only for large areas of black (not text) because all four plates must register together (meaning they have to be lined up).
What you want is a 'rich black' which isn't necessarily 100% of all colors. More here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_black
Check with your printer to find out what rich black goes with the paper stock you've chosen.
----
Powerpoint is not a design application
Boot in Single User Mode
Repair Permissions
Rich Black
Agreed. This does vary by printers, and 100% of everything will put too much ink down. Too much ink has various bad effects, depending on the paper and type of ink. Erratic glossiness, smears, smudging, and drastically extended drying time are among these bad effects. Most printers will allow the total of all 4 inks' percentages to be somewhere between 280% and 320%, again, depending on the ink, the paper and the printer's equipment.
Do not use 100 100 100 100
Do not use 100 100 100 100 when selecting your black color. For all text you should use 100% black and set it to overprint. If you have a large area of black then you can set that to a "rich black"
I may be repeating what others have mentioned, but call your printer and find out what the best "rich black" values are. i work for a printer and our "rich black" values are C-60 M-40 Y-20 K-100. Those values most definitely are different depending on which printer you decide to go with.
Good point
It used to be a rule that your percentages of CMYK for the rich black combo should never add up to more than some number well under 400, or even 300. I've forgotten this. Anybody remember?
Mara
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_black
250% is about average, but printer and paper determines.
----
Powerpoint is not a design application
Boot in Single User Mode
Repair Permissions
Thanks a lot!
Thanks a lot!
Ditto on creating a RGB and a CMYK version later
I make sure that I have a separate raw version that I get my RGB version that I do corrections to. I use this RGB file to get my CMYK and web versions. I too, label in the file name which version it is.
I was wanting to know myself how to you repurpose a CMYK document to pdf for viewing online and not lose quality in your image and keep the file size low. Is it possible?
One of our printers was able to send me a proof pdf that would simulate how the file would look printed. They called it color check. Were they just pulling my leg?
Like I said, to get good
Like I said, to get good cmyk output you should convert your psd to a flattened cmyk tif and export your InDesign file (that has the tif placed in it) to pdf/x-1a for best results and smallest file sizes. For 8 x 10 dvd sleeves I usually was in the 1.5-2MB range for hi res print and never had one file error out. Sweet!
Your printer sending you a pdf proof for color is absurd. Not only is a screen proof totally different than a printed proof, but even if you print their file your results will almost assuredly not be the same as theirs on their professional press.
The only true proof is an iris proof (really nice color proofing printer), a blueline (not for color but position only) or from the press itself. Definitely a leg pull there.
----
Powerpoint is not a design application
Boot in Single User Mode
Repair Permissions
Additive Vs Subtractive colour
The thing people are missing here is the science of colour theory. it is all very well explaining Gamuts, but this doesn't explain why CMYK has less colour available.
Both CMY (k) and RGB are tri-stimulus colour spaces, thus having 3 components to make up 'colour'. However one model is additive colour, the RGB model and the other is Subtractive colour, CMY. The theory behind this is best explained when thinking about 'painting with light' in the RGB model.
You may remember from your science days at school shining a red, blue and green spotlight onto a surface and them combining to make white light. This is because the spectral waves of light combine in frequency until the point of whit light resonance.
So, with RGB, the more you add colour, the brighter and more vivid colour you get as you get closer to white light.
However when using paint or in the printers case, ink, you do not see the colour as such. What you are seeing is reflected light from the surface of the ink. In the case of 'red', all light frequencies of the white light around us are absorbed apart from the red frequency at the low end of the spectrum which is reflected. This is known as subtractive light because light is absorbed/subtracted by the surface. Thus adding red and blue on top of each other with ink, darkens the colour as the red absorbs all light apart from red and the blue absorbs all light apart from blue. Add a third colour and practically all light is absorbed resulting in Black (in theory).
In practice you get a grey/brown colour because of the impurities in the ink and paper.
so with the CMY model you should not (in theory) need black, however the 4th ink is added (K to stand for Keyline) to add definition and purity to the blacks and outlines (usually in black).
In a nutshell then your monitor, scanner, digital camera all use additive colour to create images. Your inkjet, offset Litho and Digital presses all use subtractive colour.
In professional digital presses, they use up to 8, 10 or even 12 colours to print with. These artificial colours are enhancers to make up for the subtractive model deficiencies.
Spot colours are added to offset litho processes to provide colours on an individual basis out of the range of the CMYK model. These are often colours like flourescent's, metallic's and particularly pale or subtle colours. You will find that the PANTONE system is the most widely known spot colour matching system. Spot colours add an extra plate, film, and run on a 4 colour press and therefore incur extra costs, so beware when using them...
Enough said.
Joel Mills MCSD
Member of the Chartered Society of Designers
Extra credit goes to you on
Extra credit goes to you on this post, my friend!
----
Powerpoint is not a design application
Boot in Single User Mode
Repair Permissions
Natobasso, I feeling that they were playing with my sensibllites
Too good to be true, often is.
Your printer is lazy,
Your printer is lazy, incompetent or both in sending you that proof if they expect a sign off/approval to come from it.
----
Powerpoint is not a design application
Boot in Single User Mode
Repair Permissions
FTP and color proofs
I have figthing an uphill battle with my AE's and my CD over the use of color proofs. They believe that sending a color proof down to the printers is 'sometimes useless' because especially in the case of the newspapers they NEVER print our files properly (mis-registration and color shifts etc.) Added to that most of the press require that we send PDF's through the email or FTP, therefore no hard copy reaches them. That being said FTP and e-mail is good when you are ona dealine but without a proper PROOF, you're up a creek! Basically my AE's and CD have gotten it into their head that a proof just slows them down when they have to get stuff to the press late!
We really live in a Dilbert world!
"Try not, Do! or do not, there is no try."
-Yoda
Your AE's and CD's give up
Your AE's and CD's give up the right to bitch about bad printing if they refuse to take the time for real, printed proofs. Do they know what a 'press check' is?!
Have they ever heard the old adage, "measure twice, cut once"?
I worked at a company like this for 3 years and it never ceased to amaze me how much money was wasted because the higher ups couldn't get this simple concept through their head in the interest of saving a little time. Would you rather waste a day or $50,000 in printing costs? They seemed to choose the wasted printing.
I'm on your side: They are insane. :)
----
Powerpoint is not a design application
Boot in Single User Mode
Repair Permissions
Normal Rules don't apply here
I know what you're saying but normal press rules really don't apply with newspapers. They have a ton of advertisers in each issue and don't have the time to match every color proof. [Most of the time they lock in the ink densities and make minor adjustments to match the color of the front page of each section and a full page advertiser with a calibrated proof. Everyone else gets what they get]
Continued misregistration is a further sign of old equipment, small press runs and pressure to keep waste percentages low. Changing the design slightly on how and where you use color [Avoid smaller type as much as possible] will help counteract the negative effects of misregistration within a newspaper.
And forget about them allowing advertisers in for a 'press check'. But I have to admit it would make for one funny scene with 50 different customers all telling the pressman to tweak color to make their ad look better. All the while thousands of copies going into the waste bind.
This isn't commercial printing.
The original post wasn't
The original post wasn't about newspaper printing. :)
----
Powerpoint is not a design application
Boot in Single User Mode
Repair Permissions
What Kind of Proofs?
What kind of color proofs would you be sending? As a prepress manager for a newspaper I got crap inkjet and laser color proofs all the time with jobs that weren't even close to accurate color. I had to explain to clients we would need to output and charge them for a calibrated laser proof and have them sign off on the color before printing. Most of them replied, "I don't want any extra charges... just use my proof".
That immediately lead me to inform them we would most likely be unable to match the color in their proof which only made the situation worse.
In terms of newspaper ads there is no such thing as a customer 'press check' and misregistration and color shifts are common with older equipment.
Color shifts in the newspaper business are most always caused by incorrectly setting the proper 'Dot Gain' for newsprint stock. Also, you have to tweak certain colors (blue) to get them to print correctly because the % of magenta is too high for that type of stock.
Normal reflex blue range color lands in the (100% C)- (75% M) range. That will print purple every time on newsprint because the magenta is WAY too high. You have to know which colors to override to get them to print correctly. [In this case knock Magenta down to 50%-55%] When dot gain hammers the 50% dot she will jump back to 75%.
I had to call huge ad agencies none stop to warn them there $30,000+ full page print ad was going to print like shit because they were using SWOP coated color settings.
If you are sending print ads to a newspaper I highly recommend you educate yourself on proper newsprint color settings.
Nice.
Good point. I tell my artists (which USUALLY falls of deaf ears) to just embed the SWOP Newsprint profile in their PSD and AI artwork (we don't use indesign for newspaper ads). Incidentally when I told them (following Nato's greta advice) to save as PDF/X1a they were first: opening up the artwork in photoshop and then saving it as a photoshop PDF (NOT pdfx) then that gets sent to our traffic department who then open it up in their version of photoshop RE-SAVE the file smaller so it can be emailed AFTER printing a proof on the Laser Printer. Now I know you say that a lasre proof is not good enough, I agree, but in the interest of TIME that proof gets only seen by the traffic person before he emails the ad. . . lol it NEVER leaves the office ANYWAY.
The thing is. ANY colour proof is like insurance, if you don't got it and something goes wrong, you have nothing to fall back on.
Its interesting that you say that reflex blue is "(100% C)- (75% M) range" because we had hell with a client who insisted we FORCE the newspapers (get this) to PRINT reflex blue. LOL like they were going to change their entire press for a client who doesn't even ADVERTISE that much! lol So what we did was convert the blue to 100C 80M 0Y 0K. But like you said it comes out purple. So what you're saying is that we should change the Magenta to 55%? Dare I even TRY that?
BTW if anyone wants to see the media that we advertise in you can check out their websites that will give you an idea of what I am dealing with: http://guardian.co.tt/ and http://newsday.co.tt and http://www.trinidadexpress.com/
BTW. The print man from the Express did not understand what I was talking about on the subject of 'overprints' He said 'Our press doesn't overprint black.' 'You mean you won't SET the black in our artwork to overprint, we would have to do that. . ' 'No. I don;t know what an overprint is, we don't have a press that overprints black. . .'
What is he talking about?!
"Try not, Do! or do not, there is no try."
-Yoda
Reflex Blue
This has to be the nightmare color of newsprint. When I started a new job at a newspaper the first thing I noticed was an entire department with no knowledge of prepress and color settings. In the first week I changed all workstations to use 'SWOP Newsprint, 30% dot gain, Black generation "Light", Black Ink Limit 100%, Total Ink Limit 275%.
Next I invested $300 in calibration equipment and calibrated every monitor.
All of the artists immediately noticed there previous photoshop files looked too dark on screen. I simply told them to adjust each to look good which in most cases resulted in them adjusting curves and pulling down the midtones. In the end less ink was being layed down, the press room wasn't fighting to print unproducible color and the color quality immediately improved. So much so the press manager and general manager pulled me into a quick meeting to ask what the hell I did.
I later learned we lost a $100,000 a year advertiser because the previous production manager couldn't produce something close to 'reflex blue' on a consistant basis, which happened to be their corporate color. He told the sales person it couldn't be printed on newsprint. I just laughed and told the rep to call the customer and give them a free full page ad and if we couldn't get pretty close we'd never bother them again. They were so happy in the end they came back but that asshole rep never bought me lunch now that I think about it. ;)
All I did was drop Magenta into the 50%-55% range and instant pleasing blue was the result that proved to be pretty 'purple resistant'. You may have to experiment a bit with your printer and never promise a 'perfect' match.
It got to such a point when sales got customer complaints on color in ads they provided I'd respond, "Let me guess, blue." Once I even picked up the phone on the spot and called the designer and had them open the file on their machine. "Is the Cyan in the 95% to 100% range?" Response, "Yes, 98%". "Is the Magenta in the 75% - 80% range?" Response, "Yes, 78%. how do you know this?"
"Well, there's your problem... I haven't seen the printed ad but I'd guess you aren't happy with the purple looking results." They were shocked that I knew all of this without investigating. "If you want a better looking blue drop the magenta into the 50% - 55% range and you'll be good to go."
Ask your printer if they have a printed sheet with different color swatch combinations and the CMYK breakdowns that produced those. It will help your designers termendously when picking color. Really watch the midtones and black as those are the first to get hammered by 'dot gain'.
Laser Proofs
Color laser proofs on the newer equipment are pretty good for newspaper work in my opinion but nothing beats knowing what the danger areas for color are on press. [An indication of an image ready for print on newsprint is one that looks a touch washed out on a calibrated proof]
Most of the time problems occur because customers fail to set proper ink limits and understand the devastating impact that dot gain can have. [Their ads often print a dark mess and end up blaming the printer for their mistake]
Black within the midtones and three-quarter tones of images is particularly evil on newsprint because the ink density is much higher than CMY. Because of this I set Photoshop to generate "Light" black to force most of it off onto the CMY plates. This really helps improve color brightness.
Remember, using the corrent color settings in Photoshop will cause it to display results of how your file will come off the back of the press under the conditions you indicate.
One more thing to consider is that newspaper pages are printed 4-up or 8-up on each side of the sheet. This ultimately places your ad in the same lane on press as other ads which may influence your results. [ie. you want blue which is set to 60% magenta and the ad right in front of you is pulling 100% magenta to produce a red for their entire background.] That situation WILL impact the amount of magenta pulling across your ad and will increase dot gain.
When pressmen print a newspaper they must pick pages to color match and let everything else fall where it may. Often they target the front page and full size ads with calibrated color proofs. If you're a small advertiser there isn't a chance in hell they'll even use your supplied color proof.
It's not a commercial sheetfed environment and they aren't about to add to their waste percentage over you. We did some smaller newspapers in which on a 10,000 run the pressroom threw away roughly 5,000 copies before they got the color set and things into register. It was on press for 15 minutes. Remember, press managers get hammered on their waste percentage and they want to keep that low to increase profitability. Automated registration equipment on presses that reads a target flying by seriously cuts down on setup time, waste and misregistation issues but is about $125,000 to install and small outfits rarely invest.
Newsprint registration quality can also be improved with a series of air nozzles that get installed in front of each plate to blow air on the sheet. This helps stabalize the thinner sheet from 'fluttering' as it is pulled through the press.
Oh, the stories I could tell.
I'd LOVE to hear it!
Ever heard of this?
One of our senior artists had to go to the newspapers to make sure a particular ad printed flawlessly and asked to be directed to the part of the press that had the strobe attached (for those who don't know the high speed presses of newspapers are supposed to have an attachment that uses a strobe so that the page that passes can be seen clearly, or they have a hand held strobe light to do the same job.). Anyhoo he was directed to a guy sitting on a stool staring at the run that was flying past at high speed. "Where's the strobe?" "You're looking at him. . . he's blinking in time to the page. . ."
You're kidding. . . LOL Maybe its an urban legend but knowing the press people we work with. . . I wouldn't be surprised!
Serious
"Try not, Do! or do not, there is no try."
-Yoda
Rolling
Why on earth did your senior artist ask that? All he had to do was walk to the end of the line and pick a finished piece as it came off the press. I've found it much easier to do a press check when the page isn't moving 100 mph. I wouldn't be surprised if the pressmen did it as a joke. ;)
Sorry should have ben clearer
The ad had to be SPOTLESS, BEFORE it came off the press. In other words the ad had to be clean and registered so that there was no wastage. We know he could have gone to the end to see the finished run, but that means it would have already been printed. . . oh well doesn't matter, I thought it was funny.
LOL
"Try not, Do! or do not, there is no try."
-Yoda
There's Always Waste
Now I'm seriously confused.
Paper is threaded through a web press and the second you start it up folded signatures come pouring off the back of the machine. Those 'waste' copies are grabbed and thrown into the recycling bind. Pressman start grabbing printed samples and checking color and registration and begin making adjustments. Once it gets up to color and registration is dialed in they grab a copy for the customer doing the press check. At this point the press isn't running that fast as they continue to make adjustments and wait for final approval.
Waste is piling up by the second.
At some point the customer gives the pressmen the approval and they stop throwing away copies and start stacking the 'good' signatures onto skids. The press speed is cranked up and things start flying.
For your artist to be proofing a fully moving sheet tells me you either had piles of waste pouring off the back of the press or they were in the middle of the press run and keeping copies all the while he was there doing the press check.
I hate to tell you this but your artist made a GIGANTIC mistake not going to the end of the press to verify they didn't start keeping copies until he gave the approval.
Work & Save in RGB
If your CS colour settings are set up correctly then there is no real need to save both CMYK and RGB versions of your files.
For the past 5 years we have worked strictly (well almost) in RGB in Photoshop. We import the pictures as RGB into InDesign and let Indesign do the converting. If your CS settings are set up correctly then the conversion you get from InDesign will be the same as what you will get from PS.
Another benefit to this is you can output to various different CMYK profiles from the same RGB pic in InDesign. We have many different profiles for different media/magazines/paper that we use depending on what is called for. But we only have 1 file on our server.
We still use the preview mode in PS - and we are experienced enough to know that we will get muted blues & greens and we take this into consideration.
The only time we save out CMYK versions is if we have some tricky pics that will be run in newspapers and we want to boost the colours after conversion so they are not as dead as most newspaper conversions make them.
Build/create in RGB, Flatten/place in CMYK
I've got a pretty good system for this.
First of all, I work exclusively in Photoshop in RBG mode, for exact reasons listed here in the comments of this post. But I have a folder structure for all my projects that is like this:
Project folder
--->input folder (for storing anything that comes in from clients for project)
--->working folder (this is the primary working folder, with graphics files, etc)
------>support folder (this folder is inside "working" and I save flattened CMYK tiffs in here of...
------------>layers folder (this folder is inside "support" and I save the layered RGB Photoshop files that I create in here. Once I'm done with a Photoshop RGB file, I save it in "layers" folder, then flatten and convert it to CMYK, then "save as" (so it retains the same name, only a different extension of .tiff) as a flattened TIFF file into the "support" folder. I place ONLY flattened TIFF files from the "support" folder into my InDesign documents.
--->output folder (again, inside the root of the project folder, this is the last of the three folders (ie: input, working, output). "output" folder is where I store a record/history of what I've outputted for press/posting and when and to who I sent the files, once approved and ready to "go out" to either press or web server
Thoughts on this system anyone?
I've used it for years in many agency environments and it's worked for me everytime!!