Running windows in OSX
Submitted by mbennett2 on Tue, 2008-03-25 17:26.
I just received a new Mac Pro desktop workstation (my first with the Intel chip). Yay.
I was just wanting to see how other people are going about running windows on these machines. Are you using boot camp? Parallels? Is there something new-fangled that I don't know about?
I would obviously prefer to run windows through OSX, rather than having to reboot to fire it up. Quite honestly, I avoid windows as much as possible, but I would need to use it mainly for website testing and possibly for file conversions and things like that.
Thanks for any info... enlighten me.
Anyone??? Bueller??
Anyone??? Bueller??
I thought about it, but decided better...
I run windows on a cheap laptop instead.
~ spigotdesign.com
Me too. :) ---- Powerpoint
Me too. :)
----
Powerpoint is not a design application
Ferris has left the building.
Hey,
If you get no answers here today, I'll run your query by my uncle. He's a guru when it comes to computers and is proficient on both platforms--that's his job.
Sorry that I couldn't be of assistance. I just use an old laptop when I need to access anything windows related.
ttfn!
3dogmama
me again--got an answer--my uncle rocks!
See
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=2990&article=Apple+Bootcamp+versus+Parallels
SUMMARY
1. If working mostly in Mac, occasional Windows use for an application that's not picky about hardware, use
Parallels if running Windows XP
VMWare Fusion if running Windows Vista
2. Only if your Windows application requires access to specific hardware (for speed or functionality) use BootCamp
DETAIL
With BootCamp you choose which OS you are going to use at boot.
(+) Windows is running natively, i.e. has full control of the hardware.
(-) You have to boot into one or the other
With Parallels, Windows is run within a virtual machine inside MacOS.
(+) You can run both Windows and Mac apps simultaneously, and share data more easily.
(-) Because Windows is in a virtual machine, some operations in Windows that require direct access to the hardware will either be slower or in extreme cases not work
There's also a third option: VMWare Fusion. This is a virtual machine system provided by VMWare.
Same advantages and disadvantages as Parallels.
You can look at comparisons at
http://www.mactech.com/articles/mactech/Vol.24/24.02/VirtualizationBenchmark/
and
http://www.macrumors.com/2007/12/19/boot-camp-vs-parallels-vs-vmware-benchmarks/
Hope this helps,
Chris.
ttfn!
3dogmama
Thanks for the info. I think
Thanks for the info. I think I will probably go with parallels, so I can test sites and alter files in real time.
Other than web testing, the only thing I need is the occasional publisher file conversion or things like that. Should work fine.
Thanks again
Firefox has an IE extension
Firefox has an IE extension which uses its engine on websites. That might be a cheaper alternative.
[edit: called IE Tab]
----
Powerpoint is not a design application
I will certainly check that
I will certainly check that out, but I will still need to set up windows just in case. Can't wait to use the pc as a doorstop.
Apparently IE tab is not
Apparently IE tab is not available for OSX. Would be sweet if it was though...
I decided to go ahead and go
I decided to go ahead and go with the Parallels option, and I must say it is pretty cool.
This is a new 8-core Mac Pro Desktop and it is running it with no problems or slowdowns. Nice.