Superman and Copyright
natobasso (3953 pencils) | Thu, 2008-01-03 20:14Argh. For some reason I can't post to the recent thread called He is Not Safe. Here is my response:
In my mind, everybody owns Superman and I believe the original architects of the Constitution would agree with me whole-heartedly.
I don't think so. The ownership is currently in dispute in court as we speak; that doesn't mean fair use applies to this logo. If DC Comics loses the mark, it then goes to the original two creators and their heirs. It's not fair game for everyone to use as they please, in my view.
The writers of the Constitution weren't even dealing with patent or trademark cases when the wrote the constitution were they? Not sure, then, that these issues influenced them.
The Berne Convention of 1886 making copyright the domain of sovereign nations instead of bilateral
Examples of Copyright Infringement
If you look up 'superman' on uspto.gov you will find DC Comics currently owns the trademark/copyright but it's 'UNDER DISPUTE'.
----
Powerpoint is not a design application
My latest web design work
----
Dirt and Rust
Commenting on this Forum topic is closed.

Curses. Wrong again!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent
Maybe the Constitution's drafters had this issue in mind when it was written...
----
Powerpoint is not a design application
My latest web design work
----
Dirt and Rust
Sorry for your comment not appearing right away. It had too many links so the spam filter had a false positive. I manually approved it.
Thanks much! Thought it was something with the links. :)
----
Powerpoint is not a design application
My latest web design work
----
Dirt and Rust
Hey, Ivan! I finally get to see your new avatar. Very nice :-)
Mara