Adobe... killing Dreamweaver now?
Art D. Rector (2769 pencils) | Tue, 2011-08-16 19:47Just got some spam from Adobe - a trial offer for some new software called "Muse" - I'm guessing you other CS5 users rec'd it too. A new website creation package. A cursory look found it pretty interesting - seems real easy to use. The question though... Is Dreamweaver the latest software sacrifice for Adobe? Seems like they're stepping on their own toes with this one.
Just a thought....
Commenting on this Forum topic is closed.
Oh this looks nice, just now downloading it. I recall reading something about Muse in a headline briefly but can't remember where for the life of me. Odd. If it realistically is offering exactly what it says it will offer in the little marketing box on their site (http://muse.adobe.com/) it will be pretty fantastic. I don't overly love Dreamweaver to be honest. It creates a lot of extra un-needed code and other items that web developers don't like for proper xHTML5 code. It's alright for the live preview but even my browser does that nowadays. Hm, hope this develops into a nice suite to replace Dreamweaver with the latest coding.
They're not stepping on their own toes. The two apps are not even targeted toward the same market. In fact, you nailed it in the middle of your post:
"...interesting - seems real easy to use..."
Contrast that with Dreamweaver - which is impossible to even get started using for consumers. Think of Muse the same way you think, of Photoshop Elements compared to Photoshop.
-----------
Visit The Graphic Mac for graphics and Mac OS tips, reviews, tutorials and discussion.
I think Elements was mainly created to replace all the free copies of Photoshop they used to give away with scanners. Instead of giving away the full PS package - they give you the cheaper Elements instead. Consumers still get indoctrinated into the Adobe family, but Adobe doesn't have to give away the store in the process.
Although you could be right. But personally? Glad I don't have 1000s of hours of Dreamweaver experience hanging in the balance with Adobe holding the sword (again).
The code it produces is extraordinarily bloated, and is receiving a bit of backlash from programmers.
Outside of personal websites or brochure websites this program won't be too effective.
Visit me at Huemor Designs
www.huemordesigns.com
Visit me at JGDesigns
www.jeffreygapinski.com
One good analogy I got regarding Muse from a programmer was "Muse is to programming as MS Paint is to Graphic Design".
Visit me at Huemor Designs
www.huemordesigns.com
Visit me at JGDesigns
www.jeffreygapinski.com
That's kind of silly. The software isn't about programming. It's for visual designers who want to draw a complex website but don't want to have to deal with code at all. If it really does what it's claiming, I can forgive a lot of bloated code in exchange for flexibility and time-savings.
From what I understand, this won't be governed like a typical Adobe program. You won't just be paying for the rights of the software, but the publishing rights of the website. Since the mark up is almost unreadable you will have to use the program in order to edit your code. I'm not sure what constitutes a new website, but minor changes through the program might lead to multiple charges.
As I stated before, the mark-up on this page is enough for it to never replace programming and hand coding. Also, the program is limited in the fact that you can't really use outside code, you're limited to what Muse provides you with.
Will this help print designers who know no code and want to develop a website for cheap? I suppose, will this help in any other respect of web building outside of simple brochure or portfolio websites? No.
Visit me at Huemor Designs
www.huemordesigns.com
Visit me at JGDesigns
www.jeffreygapinski.com
Please explain. I read the info on the introduction promo and it says you can pay Adobe to HOST your site or you can host it privately. The way I understood it was you had a choice to go with Adobe or not. I saved a simple html file from the program and uploaded it to my server and it works fine - no Adobe fee involved.